Brittisk avlyssning brott mot Europakonventionens artikel 8.
Ny dom från The European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg) idag.
http://euwiki.org/index.php/ECtHR/58243/00
Från pressreleasen:
1. Principal facts
The applicants are Liberty, British Irish Rights Watch and the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, a British and two Irish civil liberties’ organisations based in London and Dublin, respectively.
The case concerned the applicant organisations’ allegation that, between 1990 and 1997, their telephone, facsimile, e-mail and data communications, including legally privileged and confidential information, were intercepted by an Electronic Test Facility operated by the British Ministry of Defence.
Från domen:
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
1. Declares the application admissible;
2. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention;
Där ser man, ett klart prejudikat.
http://euwiki.org/index.php/ECtHR/58243/00
Från pressreleasen:
1. Principal facts
The applicants are Liberty, British Irish Rights Watch and the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, a British and two Irish civil liberties’ organisations based in London and Dublin, respectively.
The case concerned the applicant organisations’ allegation that, between 1990 and 1997, their telephone, facsimile, e-mail and data communications, including legally privileged and confidential information, were intercepted by an Electronic Test Facility operated by the British Ministry of Defence.
Från domen:
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
1. Declares the application admissible;
2. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention;
Där ser man, ett klart prejudikat.
Kommentarer
Trackback
